The template-coding, or T-CODE, system is the foundation for supplying inputs to the C-MOLD analyses in filename.fem, filename.mtl, filename.prc, and filename.par. In particular, each variable or variable set in these input files has an associated integer number called the T-CODE. When an analysis program reads in the input files, it first decodes the T-CODE of each input variable to identify the relevant variable for that analysis. Because of the T-CODE system, data for more than one type of analysis can be included in a data file. Each analysis program reads only the relevant input data and ignores data that are redundant or unrelated.

Data Sets Used in the Parameter File
Parameters: 00000-00999
Number of layers across the full gap
This is the number of layers across the full-gap thickness or diameter of plastic elements used in C-MOLD analyses. Variables that change in the gap-wise direction are stored at the grid point of every layer. The accuracy of the numerical solution increases when the number of layers is increased, but at the cost of increased CPU time.
8,10,12,14,16,18,20
fine]This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. The time interval between outputs is determined by dividing the specified fill time by the number of design outputs.
0 - 100
more disk space]This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. The time interval between outputs is determined by dividing the specified fill time by the number of detail outputs.
0 - 100
more disk space]This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. The time interval between outputs is determined by dividing the specified post-fill time by the number of design outputs. The design outputs from C-MOLD Cooling are always saved, regardless of the number specified.
0 - 100
more disk space]This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. The time interval between outputs is determined by dividing the specified post-fill time by the number of detail outputs.
0 - 100
more disk space]
This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. The time interval between outputs is determined by dividing the specified mold-opening time by the number of detail outputs.
0 - 100
more disk space]This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. Design outputs in the filling stage of gas injection are saved based on filled volume; an equal volume is filled between consecutive outputs. The filling stage includes both resin injection and gas injection in filling.
0 - 40
more disk space]This parameter specifies the frequency at which these output variables are written to the results data file. Detail outputs in the filling stage of gas injection are saved based on filled volume; an equal volume is filled between consecutive outputs. The filling stage includes both resin injection and gas injection in filling.
0 - 20
more disk space]This parameter specifies the frequency at which design output variables are written to the results data file during the analysis. Values recommended are 1-100.
1 - 100
more disk space]C-MOLD analyses use an iterative method to solve a system of algebraic equations, [A]{x} = {B}, which is derived from the finite-element/finite-difference/boundary-element formulation of the governing equations coupled with appropriate boundary conditions. [A] is called the coefficient matrix; {x} is the system of unknown (dependent) variables, and {B} is the vector of forcing terms and boundary conditions.
The iterative procedure continues until an "acceptable" pressure solution or the maximum number of iterations (see T-CODE 00400 for pressure iterations on page E-16) is reached. This acceptable solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit). If the difference in the function value from one iteration to the next is within the specified convergence criterion, then the solution is said to have converged, and the calculation stops.
The convergence of the solution is not always guaranteed. The factors on which convergence depends include the nature of the coefficient matrix [A] (whether it is sparse, banded, or dense), and also the number of iterations performed. On the other hand, non-convergence does not necessarily mean that the solution is bad. The outputs from the analyses have to be evaluated based on their consistency. In most cases, the results will be in the acceptable range.
0 - 2
loose]See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable flow-rate solution (the maximum number of iterations) is defined in T-CODE 00401 on page E-17.
0 - 2
loose]See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable melt-temperature solution (the maximum number of iterations) is defined in T-CODE 00402 on page E-17.
0 - 2
loose]See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. Before the melt front is advanced during the filling stage and before the time instant is advanced during the post-filling stage, C-MOLD Fiber Orientation checks whether the solution for the orientation tensor at the current iteration has changed by more than the specified percentage. The acceptable orientation solution (the maximum number of iterations) is defined in T-CODE 00405 on page E-18.
0 - 2
loose]See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. Before the melt front is advanced during the filling stage and before the time instant is advanced during the post-filling stage, C-MOLD Reactive Molding checks whether the solution for the conversion level at the current iteration has changed by more than the specified percentage. The acceptable conversion solution (the maximum number of iterations) is defined in T-CODE 00406 on page E-18.
0 - 2
loose]C-MOLD Runner Balancing uses the fill time as the optimization criterion; when filling is balanced, all cavities should fill at the same time. C-MOLD Runner Balancing uses an iterative procedure to determine the optimal runner sizes such that the filling of all cavities occurs at the same time.
The iterative procedure continues until an "acceptable" balancing solution or the maximum number of iterations (see T-CODE 00407 on page E-19 for balancing iterations) is reached. This acceptable solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit), which is defined as the maximum difference from the actual fill time, measured as a percentage of the fill time. If the difference in the function value from one iteration to the next is within the specified convergence criterion, then the solution is said to have converged, and the calculation stops.
0 - 10
loose]C-MOLD Blow Molding & Thermoforming performs equilibrium iterations for each loading step to obtain a converged solution. The governing finite-element equations are solved for each loading step. The convergence criterion (error limit) determines when the solution is deemed to have converged. Changes in both displacements and forces are checked against this value when testing for convergence.
The default value is 0.0003. The default value has been optimized to provide a good, converged solution in most cases.

where
and
are the negative- and positive-side mold-wall temperatures;
By default, the heat transfer coefficient is set to a high value in the C-MOLD analyses. This should not be changed unless a reliable experimental value is available.
0 - ·
perfect thermal contact] See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable mold-temperature solution (the maximum number of iterations) is defined in T-CODE 00403 on page E-20).
0 - 2
loose]See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable coolant-time solution (the maximum number of iterations) is defined in T-CODE 00413 on page E-20.
0 - 2
loose]See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable pressure convergence solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00300 on page E-8).
See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable flow-rate convergence solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00301 on page E-9).
See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable melt-temperature convergence solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00302 on page E-10).
See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable orientation convergence solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00305 on page E-11.
See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable orientation convergence solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00306 on page E-11).
C-MOLD Runner Balancing uses the fill time as the optimization criterion; when filling is balanced, all cavities should fill at the same time. C-MOLD Runner Balancing uses an iterative procedure to determine the optimal runner sizes such that the filling of all cavities occurs at the same time.
The iterative procedure continues until an acceptable balancing solution or the maximum number of iterations is reached. This acceptable solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00307 for balancing convergence), which is defined as the maximum difference from the actual fill time, measured as a percentage of the fill time. If the difference in the function value from one iteration to the next is within the specified convergence criterion, then the solution is said to have converged, and the calculation stops.
The maximum number of iterations provides a safety net to prevent computations from proceeding without termination for unrealistically small convergence criteria, and to re-calibrate iterative settings within the analysis if convergence is not achieved for any specific time step.
C-MOLD Blow Molding & Thermoforming performs equilibrium iterations for each loading step to obtain a converged solution. The governing finite-element equations are solved for each loading step. The convergence criterion (error limit) determines when the solution is deemed to have converged. Changes in both displacements and forces are checked against this value when testing for convergence.
The number of iterations needed to achieve convergence for a loading step depends on the rate of convergence and the specified convergence criterion. If the convergence criterion is increased, fewer iterations would be required for convergence, possibly at the cost of solution accuracy, and vice-versa.
The maximum number of iterations provides a safety net to prevent computations from proceeding without termination for unrealistically small convergence criteria, and to re-calibrate iterative settings within the analysis if convergence is not achieved for any specific loading step.
If the maximum number of iterations is achieved repeatedly without convergence, the solution is terminated.
See paragraphs 2 through 5 in "Pressure convergence criterion," for a description on the iterative method C-MOLD analyses use to solve algebraic equations. The acceptable mold-temperature convergence solution is defined by the convergence criterion (error limit; T-CODE 00313 on page E-15).
If multiple restart times are specified, in subsequent executions, the program will continue the calculation by reading the restart file until it reaches the next earliest restart time.
This is a particularly useful feature when different post-fill times or pack/hold pressure profiles are examined in C-MOLD Post-Filling; in such cases, the restart time may be specified to be the fill time, and the subsequent analysis will continue from the end of the filling stage. This saves considerable computational time.
Intermediate results can also be viewed using this option.
The contribution from pressure work is significant only in cases where the pressure gradient is very large. In all other cases, including this term will have negligible effect on the temperature calculation.
To include pressure work, this option must be set to 1.
Pressure losses occur in the runner system when the melt passes through runners with significant change in diameters. These pressure losses are especially pronounced in areas near the gate.
The analysis automatically traces the runner system and searches for any sudden contraction in the runner diameters that is greater than 2/1, in which case, it calculates the effect of juncture losses. The analysis uses by default an internally implemented model to calculate juncture losses; however, if a juncture-loss model is specified in the material properties data file (filename.mtl), it will override the internal model.
The constants for the juncture-loss model are obtained by applying the Bagley corrections to the capillary viscosity data.
If a subsequent analysis is executed where only the material properties or process conditions have been changed, then using the restart option saves CPU time by not recomputing the geometry information, which in some cases (depending on the model) might take a long time.
Memory requirements are large to store a restart file. The restart file itself might take up a lot of disk space depending on the size of the model; for this reason, the restart file is not saved by default (the option is set to 0 by default).
If the mesh is fine, and no features of the part are close to each other, then reducing this value from its default value of 13 reduces the CPU time.
Machining accuracy must be kept in mind when defining this value. A more accurate figure for the diameter would not be useful, if the runner system could not be machined with matching accuracy.
This parameter also places a limit on unnecessary calculations.
This parameter allows the analysis to commence from a stable configuration, by imparting a non-singular stiffness to the initial parison or sheet geometry.
The size of the initial increment for pressurization stages set by this parameter is subsequently adjusted depending on the rate of convergence. A smaller initial displacement results in more rapid initial convergence, at the cost of smaller advances in the solution itself. A larger initial displacement might result in lack of convergence within the maximum number of iterations specified for each loading step.
The number of loading steps depends on the complexity of the problem. If the solution terminates due to reaching the maximum number of loading steps, the analysis can be executed again after increasing this parameter. This parameter must be increased for analysis involving movement of mold-surface regions with a high degree of complexity.
If the option is turned off (set to 0), then only regular post-filling analysis will be performed, and no interface file to structural analysis programs will be generated. If the option is set to 1, then C-MOLD Residual Stress will be executed, and the interface file for structural analysis will be generated according to the option for structural package (T-CODE 00602).
The interface files contain all necessary input data for finite-element structural analysis. The structural analysis software packages for which the interface files can be written (other than C-MOLD) are ANSYS and ABAQUS.
The default interface file is the neutral file (the option set to 0), which is used by C-MOLD Shrinkage & Warpage and ANSYS. The other options are generating input (filename.inp) files for ABAQUS with linear and non-linear options (options 1 and 2, respectively).
If the option for structural analysis (T-CODE 00602) is set either to 1 or 2, to generate interface files for ABAQUS with linear or non-linear option, then by setting the isolate mechanism for warpage option to 1, interface files corresponding to various loading conditions will be generated. The loading conditions are as follows:
As the number increases, more Prony Series modes are used, and more accurate results are expected.
If the option is turned off (set to 0), then only standard filling and post-filling analyses will be executed, and no interface file for structural analysis will be generated. If the option is turned on (set to 1), then C-MOLD Fiber Orientation will be executed.
Alternately, this interaction coefficient can be estimated from the empirical equation proposed by Bay, as shown below:

where
is the scaled concentration
> 1.

> 1.If the fiber shape factor is set equal to:

where re is the equivalent ellipsoidal aspect ratio, and the fiber interaction coefficient (T-CODE 00622) is set equal to 0, then the evolution equation reduces to Jeffrey's equation for the motion of a single ellipsoid.
If this parameter is set to 0, the fiber orientation state at the polymer entrance is assumed to be aligned at the skin and transverse at the core. This orientation state is more appropriate if the flow at the polymer entrance is radial, which typically occurs downstream from a pin gate.
If this parameter is set to 1, the fiber orientation state at the polymer entrance is assumed to be aligned at the skin and random at the core. This orientation state is more appropriate if the flow at the polymer entrance is unidirectional, which typically occurs downstream from a line gate.
The default boundary condition option is 0 (aligned at the skin and transverse at the core).
If this option is turned off (set to 0), C-MOLD Fiber Orientation will stop at the end of the filling stage, and no fiber orientation data will be generated during the post-filling stage.
If the option is turned on (set to 1), C-MOLD Fiber Orientation continues the analysis through the post-filling stage.
In either case, the interface file to structural analysis will be written to the results data file.
Even though the dominant driving force for fiber orientation occurs during the filling stage, additional fiber alignment and randomization may also occur during the post-filling stage.
This single-point density of the polymer under processing conditions is measured using a capillary rheometer (extrusion flow rate measurement).
If the solid density is known, a reasonable estimate of the melt density is:


]
: kg/m3 The pvT data reflect the transitions as the material undergoes a phase change from one physical state to the other (from melt to solid). pvT data are required by C-MOLD Post-Filling, because this analysis considers the melt to be weakly compressible.

,
, and
are model constants.

: Pa
: Kg/m3
: J/Kg-KThis model has been found to be adequate for C-MOLD Post-Filling, in which the melt is considered to be weakly compressible. The variation of density is much more significant in the post-filling stage.
The pvT data reflect the transitions as the material undergoes a phase change from one physical state to the other (from melt to solid). The kink in the curve of pvT data of amorphous thermoplastics at atmospheric pressure is the glass transition temperature of the material (Tg). This is a function of pressure. The slopes of the specific volume vs. temperature curves in the melt and solid domains (b2m and b2s) represent the bulk thermal expansion coefficients in the melt and solid states, respectively.
An abrupt transition in the specific volume vs. temperature curve is observed in the case of semi-crystalline polymers. This is associated with the crystallization temperature (Tc), which is also a function of pressure.
A high pressure dilatometry method is used to obtain the pvT data. This method is also known as the indirect method. It involves applying the pressure to the specimen by means of a confining fluid. The specimen and the fluid are enclosed in a chamber fitted with bellows. The deflection of the bellows is used to measure the change in volume.
Another common test method is the direct method, which involves applying the pressure directly to the specimen using a piston and cylinder setup. Piston deflections are used to measure the volume change when subjected to a range of pressures.



~ 10-3 m3/kgThis pvT model is an equation of state that describes the variation of density (specific volume) with temperature and pressure in the melt and solid domains, in the processing range.
pvT data is required by C-MOLD Post-Filling, in which the melt is considered to be weakly compressible.



, and K are model constants.
m, Km, b1s,
s, Ks]
m,
s: 1/KC-MOLD Filling requires the specification of the average specific heat over the processing temperature range, which is taken to be the melt (single-point) specific heat. C-MOLD Cooling also uses constant specific heat, if tabulated data (T-CODE 01101) are not available.
The standard method ASTM E1269 is used to determine specific heat capacity with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC).
It is crucial to incorporate the change in specific heat with temperature over a large temperature range in C-MOLD Post-Filling. The temperature range must cover the region between the processing temperature and the solid state.
The inflection in the specific heat vs. temperature plot corresponds to the glass transition temperature for amorphous materials. Depending on the material, the specific heat may vary 50-70% between the processing temperature and room temperature.
For semi-crystalline polymers, the area under the peak and above the baseline represents the latent heat of crystallization. For these materials, the peak of specific heat is shifted according to DSC heating or cooling scan rate. In this case, crystallization kinetics have to be incorporated to describe the rate dependence of specific heat.
The standard method ASTM E1269 is used to determine specific heat capacity with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) over the temperature range between the processing temperature and the solid state.
The specific heat data at temperatures between the processing temperature and room temperature are obtained using the standard method ASTM E1269 to determine specific heat with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC).
The data obtained are fitted according to the following model:

where
and c1, c2, c3, c4, and c5 are model constants.

The transition shifts for these materials can be dramatic when they undergo high cooling rates (quenching) that are typical during the injection molding process. It is desirable to obtain specific heat data under high cooling rates.
The specific heat data at temperatures between the processing temperature and room temperature are obtained using the standard method ASTM E1269 to determine specific heat with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC).
The data obtained are fitted according to the following model:

where
and c5, c1, c2, c3, and c4 are model constants

Thermal conductivity is a very important polymer property. Physically, it represents the amount of heat conducted by the material per unit time, per unit area, and per unit negative temperature gradient. The value of thermal conductivity significantly influences the pressure prediction in injection molding simulation.
C-MOLD Filling uses the single-point, constant melt thermal conductivity. C-MOLD Cooling also uses this value, if tabulated data (T-CODE 01201) are not available.
A transient, line-source technique is used to measure thermal conductivity. The K-SYSTEM II from AC Technology is one of the thermal conductivity measuring devices available in the market.
Thermal conductivity is a very important polymer property. Physically, it represents the amount of heat conducted by the material per unit time, per unit area, and per unit negative temperature gradient.
Thermal conductivity is a function of temperature. It is crucial to incorporate the change in thermal conductivity with temperature over a large temperature range in C-MOLD Post-Filling. The temperature range must cover the region between the processing temperature and the solid state.
For amorphous polymers, the plot of thermal conductivity vs. temperature consists of two distinct regions in a piece-wise, linear manner. The thermal conductivity remains constant above the glass transition temperature (Tg) and decreases linearly when the temperature falls below Tg. The slope of the line below Tg is approximately 0.04 W/m-K for almost all pure amorphous polymers.
For semi-crystalline polymers, the thermal conductivity abruptly increases when the temperature falls below the crystallization temperature, Tc. Below Tc, the crystalline phase appears, which creates regions of high thermal conductivity. It is important to consider these effects during the analysis.
A transient, line-source technique is used to measure thermal conductivity. For tabulated data, the thermal conductivity is scanned at temperatures from the processing temperature to the solid state temperature. More data points are collected near the transition temperature. The K-SYSTEM II from AC Technology is one of the thermal conductivity measuring devices available in the market.
The thermal conductivity data at temperatures between the processing temperature and room temperature are obtained using the transient, line-source technique.
The data obtained are fitted according to the following model:

where
and c1, c2, c3, c4, and c5 are model constants.


Viscosity is a very important rheological property that measures the material resistance to deformation. It characterizes the flow behavior of the material. The viscosity function is required by C-MOLD Filling.
Viscosity of polymer melts varies with shear rate, pressure, and temperature. Because of this, using a constant value for viscosity is inappropriate and is not recommended.
Viscosity is a very important rheological property that measures the material resistance to deformation. It characterizes the flow behavior of the material.
Most polymers exhibit two regimes of flow behavior: Newtonian and shear thinning. Newtonian behavior occurs at low shear rates, when the shear-stress-to-shear-rate relationship is linear. At higher shear rates, the viscosity decreases as the shear rate increases; this behavior is called shear thinning.
This model only works when shear rates are high. This model also does not account for the effect of pressure. Using this power-law model alone might lead to inaccuracies in the solution and is not recommended.
Capillary rheometers are usually used to measure viscosity.

is the shear rate
Viscosity is a very important rheological property that measures the material resistance to deformation. It characterizes the flow behavior of the material.
Most polymers exhibit two regimes of flow behavior: Newtonian and shear thinning. Newtonian behavior occurs at low shear rates, when the shear-stress-to-shear-rate relationship is linear. At higher shear rates, the viscosity decreases as the shear rate increases; this behavior is called shear thinning.
In the Cross-exp model, the transition between the Newtonian and shear thinning regimes is characterized by the parameter,
*.
* represents the shear stress at which the onset of shear thinning behavior occurs.The value of (1 - n), where n is a power-law coefficient in this model, represents the slope of the shear thinning curve. The remaining constants are used to model the zero-shear rate viscosity,
0.The parameter, Tb, characterizes the temperature sensitivity of
0. This tends to depend on temperature, especially near Tg. However, in the filling stage, the bulk temperature is usually far higher than Tg, and because of this, the Cross-exp model is adequate for C-MOLD Filling.The parameter,
, characterizes the pressure dependence of
0. It is not necessary to determine this constant, since most of the viscosity measurements are performed in the processing pressure range of nearly 50 Mpa. Accordingly, the data already includes the effect of pressure. As such, this parameter can be set to zero.The parameter,
, fixes the level of
0.The viscosity data are obtained using the standard method ASTM D3835 to determine rheological properties of thermoplastics with a capillary rheometer. Measurements are made for at least three different temperatures and over a wide shear rate range. The coefficients are derived by fitting the data to this model.

is the zero-shear-rate viscosity
is the shear rate
*, B, Tb, and
are model constants
,
*, B, Tb,
]
*: Pa
: 1/Pa
0, is a strong function of temperature. This model corresponds to a constant value of Tb, which is a poor approximation when modeling the behavior over a large temperature range. The Cross-WLF viscosity model (T-CODE 01313) is recommended for C-MOLD Post-Filling.Viscosity is a very important rheological property that measures the material resistance to deformation. It characterizes the flow behavior of the material.
This model is adequate for C-MOLD Filling.
Capillary viscosity measurements over different temperature and shear rate ranges are taken, and the data obtained are fitted to this model.

is the zero-shear-rate viscosity
is the shear rate
*, B, Tb, and
are model constants
*, B, Tb,
]
*: Pa
: 1/Pa
0, is a strong function of temperature. This model corresponds to a constant value of Tb, which is a poor approximation when modeling the behavior over a large temperature range. The Cross-WLF viscosity model (T-CODE 01313) is recommended for C-MOLD Post-Filling.Viscosity is a very important rheological property that measures the material resistance to deformation. It characterizes the flow behavior of the material.
This model still represents the shear-thinning behavior in the same manner as the Cross-Exp model; however, the zero-shear-rate viscosity is represented by a more extensive model that is based on the WLF functional form.
The Cross-WLF model is more appropriate for C-MOLD Post-Filling, because the temperature and pressure sensitivities of the zero-shear-rate viscosity are better represented.
The viscosity data are obtained using the standard method ASTM D3835 to determine rheological properties of thermoplastics with a capillary rheometer. Measurements are made at at least three different temperatures and over a wide shear rate range. The coefficients are derived by fitting the data to this model.

0 is the zero-shear rate viscosity
is the shear rate
is a reference temperature and is typically taken as the glass transition temperature of the material.
*, D1, D2, D3, A1, and
are model constants
*, D1, D2, D3, A1,
]
*: PaViscosity is a very important rheological property that measures the material resistance to deformation. It characterizes the flow behavior of the material.
This model still represents the shear-thinning behavior in the same manner as the Cross-Exp model; however, the zero-shear-rate viscosity is represented by a more extensive model that is based on the WLF functional form.
This model is more appropriate for C-MOLD Post-Filling, because the temperature and pressure sensitivities of the zero-shear-rate viscosity are better represented.
The viscosity data are obtained using the standard method ASTM D3835 to determine rheological properties of thermoplastics with a capillary rheometer. Measurements are made at at least three different temperatures and over a wide shear rate range. The coefficients are derived by fitting the data to this model.

0 is the zero-shear rate viscosity
is the shear rate
is a reference temperature and is typically taken as the glass transition temperature of the material.
*, D1, D2, D3, A1, and
are model constants
*, D1, D2, D3, A1,
]
*: Pa

T is the zero-shear-rate viscosity at temperature, T
is the shear rate

is the shear rate

The standard method ASTM D1238 is used to measure the melt flow index with a capillary rheometer. The basic principle involved is measuring the mass of polymer melt (at a given temperature) extruded through a capillary of known L/D ratio in 10 minutes. This flow rate is the melt flow index. It gives an indication of viscosity: the higher the flow rate (melt flow index), the lower the viscosity of the material, and vice-versa.
This value should be used only for comparing two similar resins. Depending on their respective melt flow indices, they might also be expected to show the same trends with respect to viscosities at higher shear rates. This could provide an idea of their filling behavior during injection molding.
The viscosity increases dramatically when the conversion approaches the gelation conversion level. This model has been applied to most thermosets, such as polyurethanes, without including the shear thinning effects (the parameter, n, is set equal to 1). However, for rubbers, shear thinning effects become important.
This rheokinetics model can be loosely interpreted as a function of the shear-rate-dependent part (Cross-Arrhenius) and a conversion-dependent part.
In the equation,
is the conversion level determined by curing kinetics.
gel is the conversion level at which the polymer gels, and the viscosity becomes infinity.
* represents the shear stress at which the shear-thinning behavior begins to occur. Tb represents the temperature sensitivity of the zero-shear rate viscosity,
0(T). B is a pre-exponential factor that fixes the level of
0(T). C1 and C2 are the conversion-dependent constants.The rheokinetics data are obtained by following the standard method ASTM D4473 for measuring the cure behavior of thermosetting resins using dynamic mechanical procedures. A dynamic mechanical spectrometer typically is used for this purpose.
A frequency scan is made at low temperature (prior to curing) to determine the shear dependence of viscosity. This yields the Cross-Arrhenius model constants.
Later, temperature sweeps are made at different temperature rates using a single frequency. The scans are continued as far into the curing process as possible. The resulting torque transmitted through the test specimen is measured by a transducer. The dynamic storage modulus (G'), dynamic loss modulus (G") and the complex viscosity measurements are computed based on the measured torque.
The gelation conversion is determined based on the second G', G" crossover.
From the curing kinetics data, the conversion levels at different temperatures are known. Based on this data, as well as the rheokinetic measurements mentioned above, the ratio of complex viscosity and shear-rate viscosity can be plotted against conversion level. The model constants can then be derived by fitting this data.

is the shear rate
*, B, Tb, C1, and C2 are the viscosity model constants
*, B, Tb, C1, C2]
*: PaThe constants are derived from measurements of complex viscosity using oscillatory measurements and curing kinetics data.

When the polymer melt encounters any sudden contraction of diameter in the melt delivery system (runners or gates), the pressure drop will be higher, and this should be accounted for in the analysis.
C-MOLD Filling implements an internally defined model when the runner diameters contract by a ratio of two or greater. This exp juncture loss model accounts for the extra pressure effects and will override the internal (default) model if it is specified.
The pressure losses are lumped as an end pressure term,
Pe, such that the wall shear stress,
w, can now be expressed as

or

Without taking into account these extra juncture losses, the wall shear stress would be directly proportional to the pressure drop, which is not the case when the melt flows through runners of different diameters.
The following correlation is found to work fairly well for most polymer materials:

C1 and C2 in the above model are determined by conducting experiments with capillaries of different L/D ratios (performing the Bagley correction). Suggested values of C1 and C2 for various generic materials are tabulated in C-MOLD Process Estimator User's Guide, and C-MOLD Filling & Post-Filling User's Guide.
The conversion or degree of cure at a given time, t, is defined as the ratio of total heat of reaction release at time t to the total heat of reaction.
Some resins undergo an induction period before proceeding to the curing stage. This induction time is described in terms of an induction model. Fast curing resins such as rubber molding compounds, epoxies, or polyurethanes, have no induction time.
This curing kinetics model is of a general form and has been applied to different reactive resins.
In the equations, B1 and B2 are the constants associated with the induction time, tz. K1 and K2 are the reaction rate constants; A1, and A2 are the pre-exponential Arrhenius constants; and E1 and E2 are the energies of activation. The parameters, m and n, are associated with the reaction rate order, which is m + n.
If m + n = 2, then this model becomes a second-order curing kinetics model.
Differential scanning calorimetry is one of the methods employed to characterize the curing kinetics. The sample is heated at different heating rates, and the heat of reaction is determined. The conversion levels are calculated based on the partial areas method. The constants are obtained by non-linear fitting of the DSC data to this model.


The transition temperature corresponds to the glass-transition temperature (Tg) for amorphous materials and to the crystallization temperature (Tc) for semi-crystalline polymers.
It is crucial to have a good estimate of the polymer transition temperature, as it affects the residual stress, shrinkage, and warpage measurements.
The transition points obtained from pvT, specific heat, thermal conductivity, and viscosity measurements are not usually close enough to have confidence in the data. This is because of current limitations on measurement techniques, as well as the cooling-rate dependence of this value in the case of semi-crystalline polymers.
The best method to determine the transition temperature is by a DSC cooling scan, following the standard method ASTM D3418 (Transition Temperatures of Polymers by Thermal Analysis).
If this data is not readily available, the following correlations can be used to determine the transition temperature based on handbook values of glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), Vicat temperature, or heat deflection temperature (the last two are other measures of heat resistance of polymers):
For amorphous materials:

For semi-crystalline materials:

A simple rule of thumb is to use the lowest available temperature from all sources of data.
The polymer no longer flows at the gelation point. After the gelation point is reached, the cross-linking increases slowly at first and then rapidly at higher conversion levels.
The gelation point gives an estimation of the mold-filling limits in the case of reaction injection molding.
The standard method ASTM D4473 (Standard Practice for Measuring the Cure Behavior of Thermosetting Resins using Dynamic Mechanical Procedures) is used for determining the gelation conversion. The determination of the gelation conversion is based on the second G', G" crossover. (G' and G" are the dynamic storage modulus and dynamic loss modulus, respectively, which are measured by the mechanical spectrometer). They are plotted against time at a single frequency and a controlled temperature rate. Knowing the time at crossover and temperature, the corresponding conversion level can be determined from the curing kinetics data. This conversion level is taken to be the gelation conversion.
) for isotropic materials.These mechanical properties are required to predict the shrinkage and warpage behavior of a molded part under various loading conditions.
The elongational (or elastic) modulus is the ratio of stress to strain in the direction of load, within the elastic range of the material. For isotropic materials, the measurement of the elongational modulus in the flow direction (E) is sufficient. A model appropriate for anisotropic materials requires measurement of this modulus both in the flow direction (E1) and in the direction transverse to flow (E2).
The standard method ASTM D638 (Tensile Properties of Plastics) is used to measure the elongational modulus. A tensile testing machine equipped with an extensometer is used. Specimens are cut in the flow and transverse-to-flow directions and subjected to a constant rate of elongation as the method of loading.
The Poisson's ratio (
) is defined as the ratio of lateral (or transverse) contraction strain to the longitudinal strain. This measurement is made at room temperature. A model appropriate for anisotropic materials requires measurement of two Poisson's ratios:
12 (ratio of transverse-direction strain to longitudinal strain) and
23 (ratio of strain in thickness direction to transverse-direction strain).The standard method ASTM E132 (Poisson's Ratio at Room Temperature) is used to measure this mechanical property using a tensile testing machine.
The stress-strain behavior of a material that exhibits linear elasticity is described mathematically by the generalized Hooke's Law:
]ij = [C]ijkl x [
]klwhere [
]ij refers to the nine components of the stress tensor, [
]kl refers to the nine components of the strain tensor, and [C]ijkl is the elasticity, the components of which are called the elastic constants of the material.Making use of certain symmetry conditions and transformation laws for the elasticity tensor, it can be reduced from an initial 81 components to 18 components, of which only nine are non-zero. With this reduction, the generalized Hooke's Law can be re-written as:
]i = [C]ij x [
]j
The components of [
]i are
1,
2,
3,
23,
31, and
12. The corresponding components of [
]j are
1,
2,
3,
23,
31, and
12.
and
are the shear stress and shear strain, respectively. 1, 2, and 3 are the principal directions.[C]ij is also called the stiffness matrix. The elements of this matrix can be easily determined by a simple, stress-strain analysis. The elements can be expressed in terms of material properties E,
, and G (shear modulus) in the following manner:

where

The three material properties are related in the following way:

where G is the shear modulus of the material.
The bulk modulus of elasticity,
, is defined by:

where P is the hydrostatic pressure. The sum of
terms in the above equation represents the change in volume per unit volume, or dilation.
]
: dimensionless
< 0.5 for isotropic materialsThese constants are the elongational modulus in the flow direction (E1) and transverse direction (E2), Poisson's ratios in the flow and transverse directions (
12 and
23), and the shear modulus (G).These mechanical properties are required to predict the shrinkage and warpage behavior of a molded part under various loading conditions.
The nature of flow determines molecular and fiber orientations. These orientation distributions lead to anisotropy in the molded part. Anisotropy varies with the location of a material point on the plane of a part and through its thickness. As a first approximation, the material can be assumed to be transversely isotropic at a given planar location, i.e., it is assumed that there exists a unique axis, perpendicular to which the material planes exhibit isotropy (in other words, properties transverse to the flow direction are isotropic).
The elongational (or elastic) modulus is the ratio of stress to strain in the direction of load, within the elastic range of the material. A model appropriate for anisotropic materials requires measurement of this modulus both in the flow direction (E1) and in the direction transverse to flow (E2).
The standard method ASTM D638 (Tensile Properties of Plastics) is used to measure the elongational modulus. A tensile testing machine equipped with an extensometer is used. Specimens are cut in the flow and transverse-to-flow directions and subjected to a constant rate of elongation as the method of loading.
The Poisson's ratio (
) is defined as the ratio of lateral (or transverse) contraction strain to the longitudinal strain. This measurement is made at room temperature. A model appropriate for anisotropic materials requires measurement of two Poisson's ratios:
12 (ratio of transverse-direction strain to longitudinal strain) and
23 (ratio of strain in thickness direction to transverse-direction strain).The standard method ASTM E132 (Poisson's Ratio at Room Temperature) is used to measure this mechanical property using a tensile testing machine.
The shear modulus is the ratio of shear stress to shear strain. A rail shear test method normally is used to determine this property. The technique uses a test fixture mounted in a level loading frame. Specimens (in the form of molded plaques) are machined to fit the fixture, with round end profiles to minimize end effects and produce a homogenous stress field. The specimen is mounted in the test fixture and bolted in position between the rails. An extensometer is placed on the specimen between the rails, with needle point arms at 45°° to the direction of loading. Loading is applied to the specimen and the shear strain is monitored by the extensometer. This is repeated in each of the four positions and the average value of G is calculated:
/
= P/2where P is the load.
= 2 x
45°where °
is the 45°° strain.Anisotropy in the shear modulus is so small that it might be neglected.
The transversely isotropic material model has five independent elastic constants (E1, E2,
12,
23, and G). The general stress-strain relations for this case can be written as:
]i = [C](-1)ij x [
]j
The components of [
]i are
1,
2,
3,
23,
31, and
12. The corresponding components of [
]j are
1,
2,
3,
23,
31, and
12.
and
are the shear stress and shear strain, respectively. 1, 2, and 3 are the principal directions.[C]-1 is also called the compliance matrix. The elements of this matrix can be determined easily by a simple, stress-strain analysis. The elements can be expressed in terms of material properties E1, E2,
12,
23, and G (shear modulus) in the following manner:

12,
23, G]
12,
23: Dimensionless
In this model, the polymer melt is assumed to be an amorphous, isotropic, thermo-rheologically simple, viscoelastic material, whose dilational behavior is elastic.
Thermo-rheologically simple behavior means that the time-variant modulus of the material at different temperatures can be derived from a single master-curve of material behavior at some reference temperature. This is carried out by employing a time-temperature shift function that can be represented in terms of a WLF equation at high temperatures:
where GT and GT0 are the shear relaxation moduli at temperature T and reference temperature Tref, respectively, and a(T) is the WLF shift function:

where c1, c2 are universal constants.
It was found by Williams, Landel, and Ferry that the above empirical expression for the shift function was valid for many polymeric materials in the temperature range:
where Tg is the glass transition temperature.
The shift function is very large for temperatures higher than Tg, which allows the material to respond quickly to applied disturbances. It is very small at lower temperatures (stress levels introduced into the material decay more slowly).
The shift in the master curve to obtain the response function at different temperatures is only along the horizontal (time or temperature) axis.
The following parameters are required for this model:
1,
2,,
n (The material time accounts for the temperature dependence of the material response rate; it can be expressed as an integral (between the limits 0 and elapsed time, t) of the WLF shift function).
1), G(
2),, G(
n)
The components of the "reduced" viscoelastic moduli obtained after simplifications mentioned above can be expressed in terms of bulk modulus and shear modulus as follows:

where

The elongational modulus (E) and Poisson's ratio (
) can be expressed in terms of the bulk modulus and shear modulus as follows:


,
1, G(
1),
2, G(
2), ]
, G(
): Pa
: s
In this model, the polymer melt is assumed to be an amorphous, isotropic, thermo-rheologically simple, viscoelastic material.
Thermo-rheologically simple behavior means that the time-variant modulus of the material at different temperatures can be derived from a single master-curve of material behavior at some reference temperature. This is carried out by employing a time-temperature shift function that can be represented in terms of a WLF equation at high temperatures:
where GT and GT0 are the shear relaxation moduli at temperature T and reference temperature Tref, respectively and a(T) is the WLF shift function:

where c1, c2 are universal constants.
It was found by Williams, Landel, and Ferry that the above empirical expression for the shift function was valid for many polymeric materials in the temperature range:
where Tg is the glass transition temperature.
The shift function is very large for temperatures higher than Tg, which allows the material to respond quickly to applied disturbances. It is very small at lower temperatures (stress levels introduced into the material decay more slowly).
The shift in the master curve to obtain the response function at different temperatures is only along the horizontal (time or temperature) axis.
The following parameters are required for this model:
1,
2,,
n
A thermo-mechanical constitutive equation is used for stress calculations as a function of temperature and time. It relates the components of the Cauchy-stress tensor and the linear strain tensor through the viscoelastic relaxation-modulus tensor. Assumption of transverse isotropy leads to many simplifications and a further reduction in the number of viscoelastic relaxation moduli coefficients.
The components of the "reduced" viscoelastic moduli (which are functions of the material time,
) obtained after the simplifications mentioned above is expressed as:

The above components of the viscoelastic relaxation moduli are further expressed as response functions, which are evaluated by numerical quadrature. Computational effort is further reduced by expanding the relaxation moduli in terms of Prony series.
Further mathematical details involved in this calculation of residual stresses are too involved and are not presented here. Interested users can refer to the various references mentioned in C-MOLD Shrinkage & Warpage User's Guide.
1), C11(
1), C12(
1), C22(
1),
1),
2, ]
1), G: Pa
1: sIn the most general terms, thermoplastic materials exhibit viscoelastic behavior at elevated temperatures. In this case, the strains that develop in the material when a load is applied are a function of both the history of the loading and the magnitude of the load.
However, experimental evidence exists which shows that above the glass transition temperature, Tg, the polymer material behavior is nonlinear elastic (rubber-like), especially at high strain rates. This is attributed to chain rotation and uncoiling of the long polymer molecules with very little viscous effects.
The assumption of nonlinear elastic behavior greatly simplifies the formulation of the finite-element equations. The two most commonly used constitutive equations to model this behavior are the Mooney-Rivlin formulation and the Ogden formulation. Both these formulations have been developed for an ideally elastic solid that possesses a stress potential.
In the Mooney-Rivlin formulation, it is assumed that the strain energy function, W, can be expressed as a polynomial function of the invariants of the deformation tensor, I1 and I2 (or rather as polynomial function of (I1 - 3) and (I2 - 3), such that the stresses are zero when there is no strain).
The generalized Mooney-Rivlin form of the strain energy function is given by:

Aij are the empirically determined constants; and A00 = 0, since W = 0 in the undeformed state.
The material properties are specified for each polymer zone.
The Mooney-Rivlin constants have been determined experimentally for a number of materials.
Once the strain energy function is known, the stress tensor relationships can be determined.
One of the drawbacks of this formulation is that the expression for the stress is a highly non-linear function of the stretch, even for simple elongation.
In the most general terms, thermoplastic materials exhibit viscoelastic behavior at elevated temperatures. In this case, the strains that develop in the material when a load is applied are a function of both the history of the loading and the magnitude of the load.
However, experimental evidence exists which shows that above the glass transition temperature, Tg, the polymer material behavior is nonlinear elastic (rubber-like), especially at high strain rates. This is attributed to chain rotation and uncoiling of the long polymer molecules with very little viscous effects.
The assumption of nonlinear elastic behavior greatly simplifies the formulation of the finite-element equations. The two most commonly used constitutive equations to model this behavior are the Mooney-Rivlin formulation and the Ogden formulation. Both these formulations have been developed for an ideally elastic solid that possesses a stress potential.
In the Mooney-Rivlin formulation, it is assumed that the strain energy function, W, can be expressed as a polynomial function of the invariants of the deformation tensor, I1 and I2 [or rather as polynomial function of (I1 - 3) and (I2 - 3), such that the stresses are zero when there is no strain].
The generalized Mooney-Rivlin form of the strain energy function is given by:

Aij are the empirically determined constants; and A00 = 0, since W=0 in the undeformed state.
The material properties are specified corresponding to a particular temperature and for each polymer zone. The tabulated data, if available, provide a better representation of the material behavior.
The Mooney-Rivlin constants have been determined experimentally for a number of materials.
Once the strain energy function is known, the stress tensor relationships can be determined.
One of the drawbacks of this formulation is that the expression for the stress is a highly non-linear function of the stretch, even for simple elongation.
In the most general terms, thermoplastic materials exhibit viscoelastic behavior at elevated temperatures. In this case, the strains that develop in the material when a load is applied are a function of both the history of the loading and the magnitude of the load.
However, experimental evidence exists which shows that above the glass transition temperature, Tg, the polymer material behavior is nonlinear elastic (rubber-like), especially at high strain rates. This is attributed to chain rotation and uncoiling of the long polymer molecules with very little viscous effects.
The assumption of nonlinear elastic behavior greatly simplifies the formulation of the finite-element equations. The two most commonly used constitutive equations to model this behavior are the Mooney-Rivlin formulation and the Ogden formulation. Both these formulations have been developed for an ideally elastic solid that possesses a stress potential.
In the Ogden hyperelastic formulation, the strain energy function, W, is expressed as a function of the principal stretches. The strain energy is written as an expansion in the principal stretches,
1,
2, and
3, and is of the form:

where
(i) and
(i) are experimentally determined constants. They can be non-integer and negative, with the only restriction being that the total summation above must result in a positive strain energy function.n is the number of modes of the Ogden model (n < 9).
Since the Ogden model is represented directly in terms of the stretches,
, instead of the invariants of the rate of deformation tensor as in the Mooney-Rivlin formulation, the physical interpretation of the stress-strain relationship is much easier. Another advantage of the Ogden formulation is that it provides a better fit to the experimental stress-strain data.It is recommended that a higher order (n > 2) Ogden model be used in the analysis.
Once the strain energy function is known, the stress tensor relationships can be determined.
(i),
(i)] (for each mode)
: Pa
: dimensionlessIn the most general terms, thermoplastic materials exhibit viscoelastic behavior at elevated temperatures. In this case, the strains that develop in the material when a load is applied are a function of both the history of the loading and the magnitude of the load.
However, experimental evidence exists which shows that above the glass transition temperature, Tg, the polymer material behavior is nonlinear elastic (rubber-like), especially at high strain rates. This is attributed to chain rotation and uncoiling of the long polymer molecules with very little viscous effects.
The assumption of nonlinear elastic behavior greatly simplifies the formulation of the finite-element equations. The two most commonly used constitutive equations to model this behavior are the Mooney-Rivlin formulation and the Ogden formulation. Both these formulations have been developed for an ideally elastic solid that possesses a stress potential.
In the Ogden hyperelastic formulation, the strain energy function, W, is expressed as a function of the principal stretches. The strain energy is written as an expansion in the principal stretches,
1,
2, and
3, and is of the form:

where
(i) and
(i) are experimentally determined constants. They can be non-integer and negative, with the only restriction being that the total summation above must result in a positive strain energy function.n is the number of modes of the Ogden model (n < 9)
Since the Ogden model is represented directly in terms of the stretches,
, instead of the invariants of the rate of deformation tensor as in the Mooney-Rivlin formulation, the physical interpretation of the stress-strain relationship is much easier. Another advantage of the Ogden formulation is that it provides a better fit to the experimental stress-strain data.It is recommended that a higher order (n > 2) Ogden model be used in the analysis.
Once the strain energy function is known, the stress tensor relationships can be determined.
(1),
(1), ,
(n),
(n), T2,
(1),
(1),,
(n),
(n),, Tn,]
: Pa
: dimensionlessThis is required in C-MOLD Residual Stress, in which the material response to change in temperature is taken into account.
The thermal expansion coefficient,
, is defined as:

where
L is the change in length of the specimen of original length L0 when subjected to a change in temperature,
T.The
value for isotropic materials is the same in all directions.The standard method ASTM D696 (Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion of Plastics) is adopted to measure this property. The apparatus used is a quartz tube dilatometer. The specimen is prepared and placed at the bottom of the outer dilatometer tube, with the inner one resting on the specimen. The dial gauge, firmly attached to the outer tube, is placed in contact with the top of the inner tube so as to measure variations in the length of the specimen with changes in temperature.
Temperature changes are brought about by immersing the outer tube in a liquid bath at the desired temperature. The coefficient of thermal expansion is measured using the formula mentioned above.
This is required in C-MOLD Residual Stress, in which the material response to change in temperature is taken into account.
Transversely isotropic means that the material properties transverse to the flow direction are isotropic.
The thermal expansion coefficient,
, is defined as:

where
L is the change in length of the specimen of original length L0 when subjected to a change in temperature,
T.The standard method ASTM D696 (Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion of Plastics) is adopted to measure this property. The apparatus used is a quartz tube dilatometer. The specimen is prepared and placed at the bottom of the outer dilatometer tube, with the inner one resting on the specimen. The dial gauge, firmly attached to the outer tube, is placed in contact with the top of the inner tube so as to measure variations in the length of the specimen with changes in temperature.
Temperature changes are brought about by immersing the outer tube in a liquid bath at the desired temperature. The coefficient of thermal expansion is measured using the formula mentioned above.
For transversely isotropic materials, samples are cut both parallel to the flow direction as well as normal to the flow direction. The corresponding measurements are
1 and
2, respectively.
1,
2]
1 and
2 are not available for a particular grade of resin, then the value for the generic grade may be used as a first approximation. This generic data is available in C-MOLD Database.Once a polymer material is selected from C-MOLD Database, its name is automatically written out to the material properties file. Alternately, it can be specified when creating or editing the material properties file.
It is not necessary to specify this data set to execute any C-MOLD analyses.
Once a polymer material is selected from C-MOLD Database, its name is automatically written out to the material properties file. Alternately, it can be specified when creating or editing the material properties file.
It is not necessary to specify this data set to execute any of the C-MOLD analyses.
The physical properties of the fiber are required, in addition to the material properties of the polymer.
C-MOLD Fiber Orientation assumes a default fiber density value, which is that of a glass fiber (2500 kg/m3).
The nature of resin flow and its temperature distribution during filling depends, not only on the initial melt temperature, velocity, thermal diffusivity, and mold-wall temperature, but also on the thermal diffusivity and initial temperature of the fiber. Thus, the physical properties of the fiber are required in addition to the material properties of the polymer.
The nature of resin flow and its temperature distribution during filling depends not only on the initial melt temperature, velocity, thermal diffusivity, and mold-wall temperature, but also on the thermal diffusivity and initial temperature of the fiber. Thus, the physical properties of the fiber are required in addition to the material properties of the polymer.
The physical properties of the fiber are required in addition to the material properties of the polymer.
The orientation state of the fibers and the fiber volume fraction greatly influence the thermo-mechanical properties of composites. The properties of the oriented fiber-filled composite can be generated from the orientation state (determined from the fiber orientation analysis) and properties of the unidirectionally reinforced composites. This is done by using an orientation averaging scheme, i.e., by taking the weighted average of the unidirectional properties over all fiber directions, with the orientation distribution function as the weighting function.
The Halpin-Tsai equation is used to estimate the transversely-isotropic mechanical properties E11, E22, G12, or G23 (where E and G are the elastic modulus and shear modulus, respectively) of a unidirectional composite, based on the fiber volume fraction.
A mixture-rule is applied to predict the Poisson's ratio.
]
: dimensionless
< 0.5
: 0.23 The physical properties of the fiber are required in addition to the material properties of the polymer.
The orientation state of the fibers and the fiber volume fraction greatly influence the thermo-mechanical properties of composites. The properties of the oriented fiber-filled composite can be generated from the orientation state (determined from the fiber orientation analysis) and properties of the unidirectionally reinforced composites. This is done by using an orientation averaging scheme, i.e., by taking the weighted average of the unidirectional properties over all fiber directions, with the orientation distribution function as the weighting function.
The longitudinal and transverse thermal expansion coefficients for the unidirectional composite are estimated using an averaging scheme based on the fiber volume fraction.
The orientation state of the fibers and the fiber volume fraction greatly influence the thermo-mechanical properties of composites. The properties of the oriented fiber-filled composite can be generated from the orientation state (determined from the fiber orientation analysis) and properties of the unidirectionally reinforced composites. This is done by using an orientation averaging scheme, i.e., by taking the weighted average of the unidirectional properties over all fiber directions, with the orientation distribution function as the weighting function.
The correct specification of the fiber volume fraction (or weight fraction) is thus very important in determining the properties of the composite.
The fiber volume fraction (
vol) and the fiber weight fraction (
wt) are related as follows:

where
f and
p are the densities of fiber and the polymer, respectively.If the fiber weight fraction is zero, then the fiber orientation analysis will not be performed.
The default fiber weight fraction is zero.
wt < 1The fiber aspect ratio influences the fiber-fiber interactions (which is taken into account in the evolution equation for fiber orientation tensor) as well as the properties of the polymer composite.
It is thus very important to specify the correct value of the fiber aspect ratio.
The parameters in this data set are:
)
When layers of different types of fiber mats are used, the porosity (
) is calculated as follows:

where ni is the number of layers of the ith type of fiber mat,
i is the surface density, and
fi is the density of the fiber mat. The latter two values can be found in the supplier's literature.
For anisotropic fiber mats, K11 is not equal to K22, and K12 may or may not be equal to zero.
According to Darcy's law, the flow resistance encountered by the resin when it flows through the fiber mat is calculated in terms of permeability. For one-dimensional flow, Darcy's law can be written as:

where Q is the volumetric flow rate,
is the resin viscosity, A is the flow cross-sectional area,
P/
L is the pressure drop per unit length, and Kx is the permeability.Permeability depends on the network structure of the fiber mat. The larger the permeability, the more easily the fluid flows through the medium.
Permeability is measured in terms of darcy units (1 darcy = 9.86874 x 10-13 m2).
The in-plane and transverse-to-flow structures of the fiber mat might be different, and they can create different resistances to flow. In the case of such anisotropic fiber mats, the pore area distribution shows a maximum in one direction and a minimum in a direction orthogonal to the former.
When a resin flows through such a fiber mat, the flow in the direction of maximum pore area will have the longest flow length, because it has the least flow resistance. If the pore area distribution is smooth, the in-plane melt front exhibits an elliptic pattern, the shape of which depends on the maximum and minimum pore areas. This can be characterized by the so-called permeabilities of the principal directions.
One of the principal directions corresponds to the major axis of the ellipse. This direction is denoted as the first principal direction. The second principal direction corresponds to the minor axis of the ellipse.
The melt front takes a circular shape in the case of isotropic fiber mats.
Due to small ratio of the gap thickness to the planar dimensions in many RTM and SRIM applications, these processes are often modeled with two-dimensional flow. In such cases, the in-plane permeabilities are more important than the transverse permeability. The latter is used to characterize the flow of autoclave composite processing.
The in-plane permeabilities can be measured by a center-gated disk flow or a slit flow.
In the case of center-gated disk flow, a Newtonian fluid of known physical properties is driven through the preform at constant pressure and the melt-front advancement as a function of time is recorded by a video camera. The in-plane permeabilities are determined by correlating the experimental data with the theoretical equation of the melt front advancement as a function of time. This method, while requiring more data collection and more sophisticated experimental techniques, is a very reasonable method of predicting permeabilities, especially for anisotropic preforms.
In the case of slit flow, the anisotropic fiber mat is arranged so that one of its principal axes is parallel to the flow direction. The permeability of this direction can be calculated using the one-dimensional Darcy's law mentioned above, and the experimental data of pressure drop versus flow rate. Since Darcy's law is valid only in the creeping flow range, the permeability must be determined by the slope at the flow rate approaching zero.
The principal axis of the fiber mat can be predicted from its stitch structure or from a short-shot of the disk flow. This method is simple for experiments and data correlation. However, the channeling effect that occurs at the side walls can cause significant errors in measurement for a slit die with narrow width. This error can be reduced by using a wider die, but plug flow might not be able to be preserved.
If the fiber mat preform is the same as that used for measurements, then the permeability data can be used directly in the simulation.
In many applications, the permeability of the particular preform might not be available, but we might know the permeability of each composite layer. The "effective permeability" of the preform can be calculated by the following mixing rule:

where h is the cavity thickness, and hj and Kj are the thickness and permeability of the jth layer fiber mat, respectively.
C-MOLD Reactive Molding can handle at most one anisotropic fiber mat, and multiple isotropic fiber mats..
The reference thickness at measurement is designated as b. If the cavity thickness at molding is different from the reference thickness specified in this data set, the porosity and permeability data will be internally modified by the analysis, based on the assumptions that the thickness variation in the cavity is not too large from the reference thickness, and the porosity is between 0.4 - 0.7. Otherwise, errors in the prediction could be introduced, or the analysis might be terminated due to fiber over-packing as a result of using improper values of the fiber mat properties.
, K11, K22, K12, b]
: dimensionlessIt can be specified when creating or editing a material template.
It is not necessary to specify this data set to execute any C-MOLD analyses.
The coolant physical properties are required in the coolant flow and heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a coolant is selected.
The coolant physical properties are required in the coolant flow and heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a coolant is selected.
The coolant physical properties are required in the coolant flow and heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a coolant is selected.
The coolant physical properties are required in the coolant flow and heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a coolant is selected.
The coolant physical properties are required in the coolant flow and heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a coolant is selected.
Using this temperature-dependent coolant viscosity model instead of the constant coolant viscosity improves the accuracy of the simulation. The viscosity constants for this model are available for many coolants in C-MOLD Database.

Once a coolant material is selected from C-MOLD Database, its name is automatically written out to the material properties file. Alternately, it can be specified when creating or editing the material properties file.
It is not necessary to specify this data set to execute any C-MOLD analyses.
The mold material physical properties are required in the heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a mold material is selected.
The mold material physical properties are required in the heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a mold material is selected.
The mold material physical properties are required in the heat transfer calculations. They are automatically written out in the material properties file when a mold material is selected.
Once a mold material is selected from C-MOLD Database, its name is automatically written out to the material properties file. Alternately, it can be specified when creating or editing the material properties file.
It is not necessary to specify this data set to execute any C-MOLD analyses.
Once a mold material is selected from C-MOLD Database, its name is automatically written out to the material properties file. Alternately, it can be specified when creating or editing the material properties file.
It is not necessary to specify this data set to execute any C-MOLD analyses.
C-MOLD Filling and C-MOLD Post-Filling calculate the clamp tonnage requirement by multiplying the cavity pressure at the end of the filling stage by the projected cavity surface area on the parting plane. If this calculated clamp force exceeds the machine capacity, a warning message is issued by the analysis.
If the total shot volume exceeds the maximum machine injection volume, then a warning message is issued by the analysis.
If the calculated injection pressure exceeds the maximum machine injection pressure during the filling stage, a warning message is issued by the analysis. At this point, the analysis switches from flow rate control to pressure control. This value is then used as the entrance pressure until the end of the filling stage.
With a fixed entrance pressure, the actual flow rate will decrease as flow length increases. The analysis will issue a "short shot" warning message when the actual flow rate falls below 1% of the minimum specified flow rate before the cavity is completely filled.
This data set is also used to determine the absolute pack/hold pressure profile (T-CODE 10700) during the holding phase.
If the specified fill time is too short, then the machine might not be able to deliver the necessary volume. In this case, the analysis maintains the injection rate at its maximum just as any real machine would do and issues a warning message. The actual fill time in this case would be longer than the specified fill time.
This data set is used as a limit for both the relative and absolute ram-speed profiles (T-CODEs 10600 and 10602).
In practice, it is impossible to switch between hydraulic pressure levels instantaneously. The response time depends on the control scheme and the system dynamics of the hydraulic units. Most modern injection molding machines provide a close to linear transition from one holding pressure level to the next.
In C-MOLD Post-Filling, the pack/hold pressure is linearly interpolated between two pressure levels over the hydraulic response time. If the machine hydraulic response time is longer than the time interval between any two pack/hold pressure profile settings, a response time equal to half of the time interval between the settings is used.
This value is used as the reference gas pressure if the gas-pressure control option is chosen (T-CODE 11302 is set to 0). If the specified gas pressure or the calculated profiled gas pressure exceeds this value, a warning message is issued by the analysis.
If the gas-volume control option is chosen (T-CODE 11302 is set to 2), this maximum gas pressure value will be used if the calculated gas pressure exceeds this value. This is used to mimic real machine control, in which a safety valve will open to allow the release of extra gas pressure for safety reasons.
On the other hand, if the automatic gas-pressure profiling option is chosen (T-CODE 11302 is set to 1), the analysis will continue even if this maximum machine gas pressure is exceeded, allowing the gas pressure to increase above the machine's capacity in the simulation.
The fill time is defined as the time needed for the polymer to fill the entire cavity. The fill time is usually short compared to the overall cycle time. However, the correct fill time is very important in controlling the pressure rise in the runners, gates, and part cavity, thereby helping to assure proper filling, good appearance, part strength, and dimensional tolerances.
A reasonable estimate of the fill time can be derived from the required cooling time of the part, which is approximately calculated as follows:
The penetration depth (
) of the solid, frozen layer on the mold wall is:


For the half-gap to be penetrated:


From equations (1) and (2) above, it follows that the cooling time, t, is:

Thus, knowing the nominal thickness and thermal diffusivity, it is possible to estimate the cooling time.
The fill time typically should be much less than the cooling time, to avoid premature solidification. As a rule of thumb, a good estimate of fill time should be one-tenth to one-fifth of the estimated cooling time.
The actual fill time predicted by the analysis will be equal to the specified fill time only if the entire filling stage is under ram-speed profile control. If the filling mode is switched to pack/hold pressure control before the end of filling, the process will be controlled by the specified pack/hold pressure at the entrance after switch-over. In this case, the actual fill time will be slightly different from the specified fill time.
The fill time is used to pro-rate the relative ram speed profile if specified concurrently; if the absolute ram speed is specified, it will override the specified fill time.
An optimal fill time can be found by performing several filling simulations. If the injection pressure is plotted against fill time, a U-shape process curve typically results, and the fill time corresponding to the minimum injection pressure would be the optimal fill time.
The actual fill time in C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding is the sum of the resin-injection time and the gas-injection time during cavity filling.
When a constant ram-speed profile is used, the ratio of the resin-injection time to the total fill time defines the volume fraction of the polymer melt within the cavity.
Fill timeAlternative industry terms for this stage include holding time and cooling time.
The post-filling stage starts with a packing phase, when more material is packed into the cavity to compensate for material shrinkage. This is followed by a holding phase, when the melt is held in the mold under pressure as the part cools. This holding pressure is applied until gate freeze-off, at which time the melt can no longer flow into and out of the cavity.
The machine will be under specified pack/hold pressure control during the post-filling stage.
The polymer melt experiences cooling throughout the entire post-filling stage. Typically, more than three-quarters of the total cycle time is associated with the post-filling stage. It is approximately proportional to the square of the thickness and varies inversely with the thermal diffusivity,
.The post-fill time (or cooling time) should be of such duration that the part is sufficiently rigid to be ejected. On the other hand, it should not be so long that it unnecessarily adds to the total cycle time. The mold should be opened as soon as the part is sufficiently rigid to be ejected.
C-MOLD analyses provide two additional criteria for mold opening, which can be specified instead of the post-fill time. They are:
C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding normally stops execution at the end of the gas-injection time. To avoid unnecessary execution time due to the specification of a very long gas-injection times, the analysis will stop calculation when the gas penetration has stopped during the post-filling stage.
The mold-open time identifies the time at which mold surfaces lose contact with the polymer melt. Additional heat transfer occurs between the mold and its surroundings during this stage.
The total cycle time is the sum of the fill time, post-fill time (or cooling time), and mold-open time. Outputs such as mold-wall temperature, mold-wall heat flux, and temperature difference, are averaged over the entire cycle, so it is important to use an appropriate mold-open time in the analysis.
In C-MOLD Co-Injection, the timer can be set from nearly zero (complete filling of core polymer) to nearly the fill time (complete filling of skin polymer). The program allows complete filling of core or skin materials (done by regular filling analysis).
The volume fraction of the skin polymer in the part would equal the timer setting for core injection, divided by the fill time. The theoretical maximum amount of core polymer that can be injected without appearing on the surface of the part is approximately 50% for rod-like parts and 70% for plate-like parts. However, the actual value that can be accomplished is much lower. If the timer setting for core injection is less than 40-50% of the fill time, it is very likely that core material will appear on the part surface.
Co-injection will not be simulated if the timer for core injection is not specified.
In C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding, simultaneous injection of polymer and gas is not allowed; the timer for gas injection should be equal to or greater than the resin injection time. In this process, there could be an optional delay time between the end of resin injection and the time instant the gas injection is triggered. The delay time before gas injection allows the thin sections to solidify, thus eliminating gas permeation into thin sections (so-called fingering effect). Prolonged delay time, on the other hand, can lead to hesitation marks on the part surface where the melt front stagnates during the delay period. If the resin injection time and timer for gas injection are the same, then there is no delay time.
Note that in this process, a timer setting of zero is meaningless. However, the timer for gas injection might actually be larger than the fill time, if the delay time is long enough; this is because fill time is a reference value used in the resin-injection stage for gas-pressure and gas-volume control options.
The timer for gas injection setting is critical in controlling the entire process. If it is too small, gas will blow through the melt front; if it is set too close to the fill time, the material-saving advantage of this process will not be realized.
For C-MOLD analyses, a connector element in the finite-element model can be used as a valve gate with an associated timer ID, which points to a timer for valve gate opening or closing.
The valve gates are initially closed; they remain closed until the specified time for opening, then remain open until the specified time for closing. The timers can be triggered to open or close valve gates either concurrently or sequentially. Note that for a given timer ID, the closing time must be greater than the opening time. The timers can be set for values from zero to the specified fill time.
time for opening (or closing)
fill timeSwitching the process control from flow-rate control to pack/hold pressure control before the cavity is completely filled helps avoid a pressure spike (excessive cavity pressures) at the end of filling, which can cause mold opening and flashing, and also helps avoid high impact of the ram, which may damage the injection molding machine and the mold.
If the fill-to-pack switch-over by percent volume is used, the process switches to pack/hold pressure control when the percentage of the total volume filled exceeds the specified value. The percentage of volume filled is the same as the percent of total stroke setting on an injection molding machine. A value of 0-100% may be specified for this transition. The default value is 99%.
In some injection molding machines, the controlling scheme is such that the filling stage is controlled by injection pressure, rather than flow rate. In such cases, a 0% fill-to-pack switch-over by volume can be specified, and the pack/hold pressure profile can be used to simulate the entire filling and post-filling process. The analysis will take the pack/hold pressure as the entrance pressure during the filling stage as well as during the packing and holding phases. The actual fill time will be determined by the pack/hold pressure profile.
After fill-to-pack switch-over, if the pack/hold pressure profile is not specified, the same entrance pressure at the switch-over point is maintained for the rest of the filling stage until the cavity is completely filled. If the pack/hold pressure is specified, the analysis will use the pressure profiles at the entrance after the fill-to-pack switch-over occurs.
Other fill-to-pack switch-over criteria that may be used are F/P switch-over by injection pressure (T-CODE 10302) or F/P switch-over by cavity pressure (T-CODE 10304).
Switching the process control from flow-rate control to pack/hold pressure control before the cavity is completely filled helps avoid a pressure spike (excessive cavity pressures) at the end of filling, which may cause mold opening and flashing, and also helps avoid high impact of the ram, which may damage the injection molding machine and the mold.
If the fill-to-pack switch-over by injection pressure is used, the process switches to pack/hold pressure control when the entrance (nozzle) pressure exceeds the specified value.
After fill-to-pack switch-over, if the pack/hold pressure profile is not specified, the same entrance pressure at the switch-over point is maintained for the rest of the filling stage until the cavity is completely filled. If the pack/hold pressure is specified, the analysis will use the pressure profiles at the entrance after the fill-to-pack switch-over occurs.
Other fill-to-pack switch-over criteria that can be used are F/P switch-over by percent volume (T-CODE 10204) or F/P switch-over by cavity pressure (T-CODE 10304).
Switching the process control from flow-rate control to pack/hold pressure control before the cavity is completely filled helps avoid a pressure spike (excessive cavity pressures) at the end of filling, which can cause mold opening and flashing, and also helps avoid high impact of the ram, which can damage the injection molding machine and the mold.
If the fill-to-pack switch-over by cavity pressure is used, the process switches to pack/hold pressure control when the cavity pressure at a specified location exceeds the specified value. In practice, this requires the use of a pressure transducer in the mold.
In C-MOLD analyses, a node in the finite-element mesh (corresponding to the location of pressure transducer) should be specified, along with the desired switch-over pressure.
After fill-to-pack switch-over, if the pack/hold pressure profile is not specified, the same entrance pressure at the switch-over point is maintained for the rest of the filling stage until the cavity is completely filled. If the pack/hold pressure is specified, the analysis will use the pressure profiles at the entrance after the fill-to-pack switch-over occurs.
Other fill-to-pack switch-over criteria that can be used are F/P switch-over by percent volume (T-CODE 10204) or F/P switch-over by injection pressure (T-CODE 10302).
The timer for hold pressure begins when the fill-to-pack switch-over occurs. It can end at any time during the post-filling stage (including at the end of the post-filling stage). If the timer for hold pressure is not specified, C-MOLD Post-Filling will use the specified post-fill time. If the timer for hold pressure is specified, then when the timer for hold pressure is reached, the holding pressure is released, and C-MOLD Post-Filling continues until the post-fill time is reached.
The gate dimensions must be adjusted according to part thickness to assure proper packing during the holding phase.
timer for hold pressure
post-fill timeThe temperature of the part should be sufficiently low so that it is rigid enough to be ejected without significant deformation. In practice, the post-fill (cooling) time has to be determined by trial and error, but using control techniques by placing thermocouples in appropriate locations in the mold is sometimes unwieldy.
C-MOLD Cooling provides a convenient way to determine the required post-fill (cooling) time by simply specifying the ejection temperature criterion. This criterion is used for thermoplastic injection molding analysis only. If this criterion is specified, then the analysis computes the post-fill time. The program stops when the average bulk temperature falls below the specified ejection temperature.
Parts are normally ejected when the temperature falls below the glass transition temperature. Cooling the part much lower would merely increase the overall cycle time. An ideal (optimal) ejection temperature should be such that the entire part is sufficiently rigid to be ejected.
Using appropriate process conditions and cooling channel layout, it is possible to minimize the overall cycle time.
In C-MOLD Cooling, either the post-fill time or this P/O switch-over by ejection temperature may be used to trigger the mold-opening action. If both conditions are specified, C-MOLD Cooling will use the specified post-fill time.
The conversion level in the part should be such that it meets the part specifications, and the part is rigid enough to be ejected without significant deformation. In practice, this post-fill time (or curing time) has to be determined by trial and error, but using control techniques by measuring the conversion level of the part in the mold is sometimes unwieldy.
C-MOLD Reactive Molding provides a convenient way to determine the required post-fill time (or curing time) by simply specifying the ejection conversion criterion. This criterion is used for reactive injection molding analysis only. If this criterion is specified, then the analysis computes the post-fill time. The program stops when the average conversion at every node exceeds the specified ejection conversion value.
Ejection conversion values can be specified between the initial conversion level and 1. A conversion value of 1 means that the resin is completely cured, which, in theory, can never happen. If the specified conversion value is less than the initial conversion level or is equal to 1, C-MOLD Reactive Molding will not estimate the post-fill time (or curing time).
If both post-fill time and P/O switch-over by ejection conversion are specified, then C-MOLD Reactive Molding will use the specified post-fill time.
The ram velocity is determined by the dynamics of the injection system. The injection rate can be better controlled in machines equipped with closed-loop controls, rather than open-loop controls. While many machines inject the melt at a constant flow rate, those equipped with sophisticated process controllers are capable of injecting the melt at a variable rate with typically five or ten control stages.
Variable-rate injection of the melt provides many advantages. These include improving surface finish (a variable injection rate can be used to reduce jetting and excessive shear stress problems by injecting the melt more slowly when it reaches the gate) and reducing injection pressure.
An optimal ram-speed profile delivers a slow flow rate as the melt passes through the gate area, then increases the flow rate as the melt fills the majority of the cavity, and finally reduces the flow rate prior to completing filling to eliminate a pressure spike (sharp increase in pressure) and flashing due to mold opening (caused by required clamp force exceeding the machine maximum clamp force capability).
In short, using an optimal ram speed profile improves the filling process and part quality.
The two parameters in the absolute ram-speed profile are percentage of stroke and percentage of speed. The injection rate in an absolute ram-speed profile is relative to the maximum machine injection rate. The percentage of stroke is pro-rated based on part volume. The fill time will be determined by the volume to be filled, the absolute ram-speed profile, and the maximum machine injection rate.
In injection machines, the barrel diameter is constant. The polymer melt can be considered to be incompressible, at least during the filling stage. Given these facts, the volumetric flow rate of the melt can be considered to be approximately proportional to the linear velocity of the ram.
Since the inputs are based on percentages, the settings should be between 0 and 100. The first and last setting for percentage of stroke must be 0 and 100, respectively. The ram speed between two controller settings is linearly interpolated. The same number of controller settings which exist on the machine should be used in the analysis.
If the velocity vs. position data is known, it can be easily converted to this input format as explained in this example:
Machine Parameters:
| Ram position (cm) | Velocity (cm/s) | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Based on the maximum machine speed of 10 cm/s, the percentage of speed settings are 15%, 30%, 60%, 60%, and 15%.
Thus, the absolute ram-speed profile settings in this case are as follows:
| percent of stroke | percent of speed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Suppose the volume to be filled (including both runners and part) is 40 cm^3. The percentage of stroke is pro-rated based on part volume: this means the volume to be filled is broken into segments based on the percentage of stroke. In the above case, the volume segments are each 25% of the total volume, or 10 cm3 each. The first 10 cm3 is filled at a rate of 96 x (15/100) = 14.4 cm3/s. The elapsed time is thus 10/14.4 ~ 0.7 s. The next 10 cm3 is filled at a rate of 96 x (30/100) = 28.8 cm3/s. The elapsed time is 10/28.8 ~ 0.35 s. In this way, the cumulative time, which will be the actual fill time, can be calculated.
| position (cm) | time (s) | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The speed is determined by dividing the change in position by the elapsed time. In the above example, the change in position occurs in equal segments of 1 cm. For the first segment, the elapsed time is 0.4 s. Thus, the speed is 1/0.4 = 2.5 cm/s. For the next segment, the elapsed time is 0.2 s. Thus, the speed is 1/0.2 = 5 cm/s. The rest of the calculations can be done similarly. The percentage of speed is based on the maximum machine injection speed (10 cm/s). Thus, the percentage of speed settings for this example are 0%, 25%, 50%, 50%, and 25%.
The absolute ram-speed profile settings for the above example are:
| percent of stroke | percent of speed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Thus, position vs. time data is easily converted to percentage of stroke vs. percentage of speed data.
The ram velocity is determined by the dynamics of the injection system. The injection rate can be better controlled in machines equipped with closed-loop controls, rather than open-loop controls. While many machines inject the melt at a constant flow rate, those equipped with sophisticated process controllers are capable of injecting the melt at a variable rate with typically five or ten control stages.
Variable-rate injection of the melt provides many advantages. These include improving surface finish (a variable injection rate can be used to reduce jetting and excessive shear stress problems by injecting the melt more slowly when it reaches the gate) and reducing injection pressure.
An optimal ram-speed profile delivers a slow flow rate as the melt passes through the gate area, then increases the flow rate as the melt fills the majority of the cavity, and finally reduces the flow rate prior to completing filling to eliminate a pressure spike (sharp increase in pressure) and flashing due to mold opening (caused by required clamp force exceeding the machine maximum clamp force capability).
In short, using an optimal ram speed profile improves the filling process and part quality.
The two parameters in the absolute ram-speed profile are percentage of stroke and percentage of speed. Since the inputs are based on percentages, the settings should be between 0 and 100. The first and last setting for percentage of stroke must be 0 and 100, respectively. The ram speed between two controller settings is linearly interpolated.
If the relative ram-speed profile is used, the injection rate is pro-rated by the total volume to be filled to achieve the specified fill time. In other words, the flow rate is automatically adjusted based on the specified ram-speed profile and fill time. The actual injection flow rate is also constrained by the maximum machine injection rate. The percentage of stroke is pro-rated based on part volume.
Both C-MOLD Filling EZ and C-MOLD Filling calculate the recommended ram-speed profile, based on the requirement of constant melt-front velocity. These analyses may be executed without specifying any ram-speed profile initially; the recommended ram-speed profile can be used subsequently to execute another analysis. This recommended ram-speed profile can be converted to machine settings easily as explained in the following example:
Recommended ram speed profile:
| percent of stroke | percent of speed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| percent of stroke | percent of speed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Based on the percentage of stroke settings and total volume to be filled, each volume segment is 8 cm3.

| percent of stroke | percent of speed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
In gas-assisted injection molding, the two most widely used methods for controlling the gas injection are gas-pressure control and gas-volume control.
In the gas-volume control process, a fixed amount of gas is first metered into a compression cylinder and then compressed with a plunger into the mold to displace the polymer melt. C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding computes the gas pressure based on the changing gas volume within the compression cylinder and the cavity, as well as the gas plunger compression-speed profile.
The actual gas-injection flow rate is pro-rated by the initial gas volume in the compression cylinder (T-CODE 12000) to be injected within the specified traveling time of the gas plunger (T-CODE 12300).
The number of settings should be set equal to the actual number of controller settings available in the machine.
Example settings:
| percent of stroke | percent of speed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
During the early stages of the post-filling (cooling) stage, more material is packed into the cavity under high holding pressure to compensate for material shrinkage due to increased density of the polymer melt which in turn is due to increased pressure and decreased temperature.
The time interval during which this occurs is the packing time, or holding time. The timer for hold pressure (T-CODE 10400) defines the duration of this time and signals the release of pressure during the post-filling (cooling) stage.
The packing pressure level is very important in preventing flashing and tool damage. The proper holding pressure helps to assure good surface finish and to prevent shrinkage or voids. In practice, the pack/hold pressure level is typically taken to be 80% of the injection pressure at the end of filling.
Advanced process controllers are capable of providing profiled pack/hold pressure levels. Providing a profiled pack/hold pressure offers many advantages, including lowering the clamp force requirement and maintaining good part quality.
The actual pack/hold pressure profile is determined by multiplying the maximum machine injection pressure (T-CODE 10002) by the individual percentage of injection pressure specified; the pressure setting is pro-rated with respect to the maximum machine injection pressure. The actual time is determined by multiplying the timer for hold pressure (T-CODE 10400) by the individual percentage of time.
The default pack/hold pressure is constant.
Example settings:
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(after F/P switch-over) |
|
(C/100 x 80) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no pack/hold pressure profile is specified, C-MOLD Post-Filling assumes that the entrance pressure at the instant of fill-to-pack switch-over remains constant throughout the holding time.
The other pack/hold pressure control that can be specified is a relative pack/hold pressure profile (T-CODE 10702), in which the pressure level is pro-rated with respect to the entrance pressure at the instant of fill-to-pack switch-over.
During the early stages of the post-filling (cooling) stage, more material is packed into the cavity under high holding pressure to compensate for material shrinkage due to increased density of the polymer melt which in turn is due to increased pressure and decreased temperature.
The time interval during which this occurs is the packing time, or holding time. The timer for hold pressure (T-CODE 10400) defines the duration of this time and signals the release of pressure during the post-filling (cooling) stage.
The packing pressure level is very important in preventing flashing and tool damage. The proper holding pressure helps to assure good surface finish and to prevent shrinkage or voids. In practice, the pack/hold pressure level is typically taken to be 80% of the injection pressure at the end of filling.
Advanced process controllers are capable of providing profiled pack/hold pressure levels. Providing a profiled pack/hold pressure offers many advantages, including lowering the clamp force requirement and maintaining good part quality.
The actual pack/hold pressure profile is determined by multiplying the pressure at the polymer entrance at the instant of fill-to-pack switch-over by the individual percentage of pressure specified; the pressure setting is pro-rated with respect to the entrance pressure. The actual time is determined by multiplying the timer for hold pressure (T-CODE 10400) and the individual percentage of time.
The default pack/hold pressure is constant.
Example settings:
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(after F/P switch-over) |
|
(C/100 x 80) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no pack/hold pressure profile is specified, C-MOLD Post-Filling assumes that the entrance pressure at the instant of fill-to-pack switch-over remains constant throughout the holding time.
The other pack/hold pressure control that can be specified is an absolute pack/hold pressure profile (T-CODE 10700), in which the pressure level is pro-rated with respect to the maximum machine injection pressure.
In gas-assisted injection molding, the two most widely used methods for controlling the gas injection are gas-pressure control and gas-volume control.
With gas-pressure control, a profiled (constant or step) gas pressure is imposed at the gas entrance point; the gas pressure is regulated during the gas-injection stage. Using the specified gas-pressure profile as the input, the analysis computes the resulting polymer melt flow rate in the filling and post-filling stages.
In C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding, it also is possible to obtain an automatic gas-pressure profile, based on the relative ram-speed profile when the gas-injection control option is set to gas-pressure control (T-CODE 11302 is set to 0). The calculated gas-injection profile would be such that the melt fills the cavity based on the specified ram-speed profile.
Example Settings:
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ambient temperature value is used to calculate the heat transfer from mold exterior surfaces to the ambient medium (air). For this calculation, the mold exterior surface is considered to be a sphere with an equivalent diameter to preserve the minimum surface area of the box within which one can fit all cooling channels (excluding hoses), runner systems and cavity.
In C-MOLD analyses the default ambient temperature is taken to be 298.16 K (25 °C). The specified ambient temperature is also used as the mold temperature in C-MOLD Filling, if the coolant manifold control (T-CODE 11100) is not specified in the simulation.
In the actual process, due to viscous heating effects in the nozzle, the actual inlet temperature might be higher than the barrel temperature setting on the injection molding machine. The temperature rise could be as much as 30 °C, depending on the injection speed and material properties.
There are two possible work-arounds for C-MOLD simulations to compensate for this nozzle temperature rise:
The inlet melt temperature should be greater than the transition temperature of the polymer.
Handbook values of suggested inlet temperatures for various resins can be used as a starting point.
C-MOLD Co-Injection is capable of handling a different melt temperature for the second (core) polymer material.
In the actual process, due to viscous heating effects in the nozzle, the actual inlet temperature may be higher than the barrel temperature setting on the injection molding machine. The temperature rise may be as much as 30 °C, depending on the injection speed and material properties.
There are two possible work-arounds for C-MOLD simulations to compensate for this nozzle temperature rise:
The inlet melt temperature should be greater than the transition temperature of the polymer.
Handbook values of suggested inlet temperatures for various resins can be used as a starting point.
C-MOLD Co-Injection will issue an error message and terminate execution, if the core polymer inlet melt temperature is not specified.
In all, the inlet melt conversion of the material is typically very small prior to injection.
C-MOLD Reactive Molding assumes a constant inlet melt conversion at all entrance points. Any value between 0 and the material gelation conversion can be specified. If the material has an induction period, then any value between -1 and the gelation conversion can be specified. Values of -1, 0, and 1 for the inlet melt conversion correspond to the beginning of induction period, the beginning of conversion and the end of conversion, respectively.
One way to estimate the initial conversion is to quench a small material sample being injected through the nozzle or plunger, then perform a DSC experiment to measure the residual conversion. Another way to estimate the initial conversion is by using the material constants for isothermal induction time or isothermal curing kinetics, and the actual temperature and time history of the material before injection. For more details on this, refer to the C-MOLD Reactive Molding User's Guide.
0
1 during conversion
0
0 during induction periodThe mold-wall temperature is determined by the heat transfer taking place between the coolant flow in the cooling channel network, heat released by the polymer melt in the cavity, and heat transfer to the ambient air.
The mold-wall temperature has little influence during the filling stage. The average coolant temperature or the ambient temperature can be assumed to be the approximate value of the mold-wall temperature in C-MOLD Filling.
However, the mold-wall temperature has a significant effect during the post-filling (cooling) stage, which has a direct impact on the overall cycle time and part quality. It is very important to determine the mold-wall temperature distribution as a function of time and position. C-MOLD Cooling performs such a calculation based on the coolant manifold control data, among other process conditions.
The parameters for the coolant manifold control are: manifold ID, inlet coolant temperature, total coolant flow rate, total coolant pressure drop, and coolant material ID.
A coolant manifold is defined as a connected network of cooling channels (regular, baffles, bubblers) that has one entrance and one exit point. Each coolant manifold is assigned a unique manifold control identification number (ID).
The entrance node of each coolant manifold has an associated inlet coolant temperature as specified. This temperature is a nodal property that points to the corresponding coolant manifold ID in the process conditions data file (filename.prc). The number of occurrences of the coolant manifold control data set in the process conditions data file should match the number of coolant manifolds used in the finite-element model.
Either the coolant flow rate or pressure drop can be specified as the boundary condition for C-MOLD Coolant Flow. If both are specified, then the total flow rate will be used. Based on the flow rate calculations, a heat transfer coefficient is estimated, and this becomes the boundary condition for calculating the heat transfer to the cooling channels. The flow rate should be chosen such that there is turbulent flow in the network, which leads to better heat transfer.
The coolant material ID is not used in the current C-MOLD release; only one coolant type can be used in the analysis.
To obtain parts that are free of runners, flash, and gate stubs, hot runner systems (also referred to as hot manifold systems or runnerless molding) may be employed. The polymer melt in hot runners is maintained in a molten state by internal or external heaters, and it is not ejected with the molded part. The heated runner plates are insulated from the rest of the mold.
In the case of insulated runner systems, oversized passages of sufficient size are formed in the mold plate, such that under operating conditions, the insulation effect of the frozen plastic adjacent to the wall combined with the heat applied with each shot maintains an open, molten flow path.
Hot runners provide the advantage of maintaining a uniform melt temperature from the nozzle to the cavities.
In the current release of C-MOLD, only externally heated runners are handled.
It is common practice to control the temperatures at individual sections of the hot runner manifold to achieve a controlled flow distribution. All hot runner elements controlled under one section should point to a unique hot runner manifold ID with a properly assigned wall temperature; this information is stored in the finite-element mesh file (filename.fem).
At the beginning of the cycle, the melt temperature in the hot runner may not be equal to the inlet melt temperature or the hot runner wall temperature, as the melt typically undergoes shear heating during the filling stage and cooling during the post-filling (cooling) and mold-opening stages. An accurate estimate of the initial temperature in the hot runner should be determined by a cyclic, steady-state analysis.
The current C-MOLD analyses, however, assume the initial melt temperature in a hot runner to be equal to the inlet melt temperature or the hot runner wall temperature, depending on the initial fill condition specified for the analysis.
The hot runner manifolds are separated from the mold base by glass fiber insulation or by an air gap. C-MOLD Cooling uses this insulation thickness to determine the heat transfer from the hot runner manifold to the surrounding mold base. The insulation thickness used in C-MOLD Cooling depends on whether the insulation is provided by glass fiber or an air gap.
When glass-fiber insulation is used, its thickness is used as the insulation thickness value.
When a small air gap separates the hot runners from the mold base, an equivalent insulation thickness must be specified for the analysis. The equivalent insulation thickness can be computed as follows:
where

The thermal conductivity of glass fiber is ~ 0.04 W/m-K.
The thermal conductivity of air varies between 0.033-0.048 W/m-K in the temperature range of 90-320 °C. The actual value of the thermal conductivity corresponding to the hot runner temperature can be found in any heat transfer handbook.
Use the above formula to determine the equivalent air gap thickness and use that value as the insulation thickness for C-MOLD Cooling.
On rare occasions, the hot runner wall temperature is controlled as a function of time. This is done to maintain a uniform temperature during the filling and packing stages of the injection molding cycle.
It is common practice to control the temperatures at individual sections of the hot runner manifold to achieve a controlled flow distribution. All hot runner elements controlled under one section should point to a unique hot runner manifold ID with a properly assigned wall temperature; this information is stored in the finite-element mesh file (filename.fem).
There can be as many occurrences of this data set in the process conditions data file (filename.prc) as the actual process controller settings in the machine.
The gas pressure level is critical in assuring proper filling in the gas-assisted injection molding process. Since the effective gas-injection time (the interval between the beginning of gas injection and the instant the cavity is completely filled) is relatively short, the gas pressure at the gas entrance will be approximately constant during cavity filling. This is true regardless of whether the process employs a constant gas pressure, a profiled gas pressure, or even constant gas volume. The resulting change in gas pressure due to changes in gas-volume or gas-pressure control becomes significant only during the post-filling stage.
Prior to gas injection, the volumetric flow rate at both the melt front and polymer entrance is based on the specified ram-speed profile. After gas injection, the flow rate of the advancing melt front depends on the gas pressure level. In general, the higher the gas pressure, the faster the polymer flows, and the faster the fill time.
An estimate of the gas pressure can be obtained by first executing C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding with the automatic gas-pressure profile option and then using a reasonable, average value from this output as the gas-pressure level at the entrance.
For a more realistic pressure control with varying gas pressure during filling and post-filling stages, use the variable gas pressure profile (T-CODE 10704) and the maximum gas pressure (T-CODE 10010).
This, along with the initial gas volume (T-CODE 12000), is used to determine the subsequent change in pressure and volume of the gas, based on the rate of compression.
This, along with the initial gas pressure (T-CODE 11301), is used to determine the subsequent change in pressure and volume of the gas based on the rate of compression.
The volume of the gas-injection line is important in C-MOLD Gas-Assisted Injection Molding, to calculate the resulting gas pressure accurately. There will be significant variation in the final gas pressure if the volume of the gas-injection line is not taken into account, as the compression ratio will be different.
The volume of the gas-injection line can be estimated by measuring the length of the gas-injection tube between a control valve close to the exit of the compression cylinder and the gas-injection point, and multiplying this length by the internal cross-sectional area of the tube.
When the gas plunger compression-speed profile (T-CODE 10606) is used, the actual injection flow rate of the gas is pro-rated by the initial gas volume (T-CODE 12000) and this traveling time of the gas plunger.
C-MOLD Blow Molding & Thermoforming automatically determines the direction of positive pressure application to deform the parison or sheet on to the mold surfaces. If the depressurization option is set to 0, pressure or vacuum is applied in a manner that stretches the polymer onto the mold inner surfaces. If this option is set to 1, it specifies the depressurization stage, and the pressure is applied in a manner that withdraws the polymer or sheet from the mold inner surfaces. By default, this option is set to 0.
The extent of pressurization is determined by the maximum distance moved by a node associated with the polymer (parison or sheet); this is represented by the maximum displacement parameter in this data set.
A pre-pressurization stage in blow-molding is specified by entering a maximum displacement that corresponds to a small distance (say, 5%) of the parison diameter or sheet length.
A final pressurization stage is specified by entering a displacement that corresponds to the maximum distance a polymer node is expected to travel; a rule of thumb is to use the sum of the maximum length, width, and height dimensions of the mold inner surfaces to ensure that all polymer nodes in the parison or sheet that are expected to deform into the mold cavity do so before the analysis terminates.
The release option is used by the analysis to accommodate moving plugs or stretch rods, from which the polymer releases during the pressurization stage. If this option is set to 1, the polymer is allowed to lift off plugs or stretch rods. For most analyses, 0 would be the appropriate entry for this option.
The displacement stage is used to specify the movement of mold units, for instance, the closing of the two mold-halves in a blow-molding process. The displacement stage is further classified into two categories: constant pressure stage, or constant volume stage. The constant volume stage is used only in processes in which molds close around a parison with bottom pinch-off.
The time at which each mold-surface unit starts and stops moving in this displacement stage have to be entered. These time instances are used only to correctly synchronize the mold parts. Consequently, the absolute magnitudes of the instances are not important, although the relative magnitudes are important in the case of multiple mold motions.
An integer between 1 and 3 must be entered for the mold ID. This mold surface number identifies all the elements associated with this event. The same number occurs in the element property data set in the finite-element mesh file.
The displacement is the net distance moved by the mold during this stage. It must be specified for all mold-surface units that are in motion during this stage.
The direction identifies the global coordinate axis along which this motion occurs. The displacement directions are identified as follows:
The release option is used in the analysis to accommodate moving plugs or stretch rods, from which the polymer releases during the displacement stage. If this option is set to 1, the polymer is allowed to lift off plugs or stretch rods. For most analyses, 0 would be the appropriate entry for this option.
The displacement stage is used to specify the movement of mold units, for instance, the closing of the two mold-halves in a blow-molding process. The displacement stage is further classified into two categories: constant pressure stage, or constant volume stage. The constant volume stage is used only in processes in which molds close around a parison with bottom pinch-off.
The time at which each mold-surface unit starts and stops moving in this displacement stage have to be entered. These time instances are only used to correctly synchronize the mold parts. Consequently, the absolute magnitudes of the instances are not important, although the relative magnitudes are important in the case of multiple mold motions.
An integer between 1 and 3 must be entered for the mold ID. This mold surface number identifies all the elements associated with this event. The same number occurs in the element property data set in the finite-element mesh file.
The displacement is the net distance moved by the mold during this stage. It must be specified for all mold-surface units that are in motion during this stage.
The direction identifies the global coordinate axis along which this motion occurs. The displacement directions are identified as follows:
The release option is used in the analysis to accommodate moving plugs or stretch rods, from which the polymer releases during the displacement stage. If this option is set to 1, the polymer is allowed to lift off plugs or stretch rods. For most analyses, 0 would be the appropriate entry for this option.
As the cavity fills, layers of the polymer melt flow parallel to each other. The layer adjacent to the wall is stationary, and other layers move at increasing rates the farther they are away from the wall. The maximum rate of this layer movement occurs somewhere between the mold wall and the center of the cavity. This layer movement of the polymer melt is called shearing.
Shear rate is the rate of movement of these layers. The shear rate is also called the deformation rate, or strain rate. The force per unit area acting on the fluid to produce this shearing action is called the shear stress.
Shear stress is a measure of force and shear rate (or strain rate) is a measure of deformation. The viscosity of the polymer is a function that relates the stress to the strain (or shear rate). Those fluids that exhibit a linear stress-strain behavior are known as Newtonian fluids. Typically, most polymer melts are non-Newtonian; they exhibit a non-linear stress-strain relationship. The viscosity of polymer melts usually decreases as the shear rate increases. This type of behavior is termed pseudoplastic.
Increasing the shear rate or shear stress to above certain critical values would lead to material degradation. It also would lead to flow instabilities, such as melt fracture. These critical levels of shear rate and shear stress depend on the nature of the polymer and must be determined experimentally. These values are usually obtained directly from the resin manufacturer. For some materials, this data also is available in C-MOLD Database.
The shear-rate and shear-stress levels should be kept below these maximum, critical values. Representative outputs are available from the analysis. Considerations should be given to ram speed, gate dimensions (and type of gate), and injection pressure to obtain more favorable shear rates and shear stresses.
As the cavity fills, layers of the polymer melt flow parallel to each other. The layer adjacent to the wall is stationary, and other layers move at increasing rates the farther they are away from the wall. The maximum rate of this layer movement occurs somewhere between the mold wall and the center of the cavity. This layer movement of the polymer melt is called shearing.
Shear rate is the rate of movement of these layers. The shear rate is also called the deformation rate, or strain rate. The force per unit area acting on the fluid to produce this shearing action is called the shear stress.
Shear stress is a measure of force and shear rate (or strain rate) is a measure of deformation. The viscosity of the polymer is a function that relates the stress to the strain (or shear rate). Those fluids that exhibit a linear stress-strain behavior are known as Newtonian fluids. Typically, most polymer melts are non-Newtonian; they exhibit a non-linear stress-strain relationship. The viscosity of polymer melts usually decreases as the shear rate increases. This type of behavior is termed pseudoplastic.
Increasing the shear rate or shear stress to above certain critical values would lead to material degradation. It also would lead to flow instabilities, such as melt fracture. These critical levels of shear rate and shear stress depend on the nature of the polymer and must be determined experimentally. These values are usually obtained directly from the resin manufacturer. For some materials, this data also is available in the C-MOLD Database.
The shear-rate and shear-stress levels should be kept below these maximum, critical values. Representative outputs are available from the analysis. Considerations should be given to ram speed, gate dimensions (and type of gate), and injection pressure to obtain more favorable shear rates and shear stresses.
The shear-stress level should be kept low during the filling stage to improve surface finish and part quality.
As a rule of thumb, the maximum shear-stress level should be below 20 x
*, the stress level at which the viscosity changes from Newtonian behavior to shear-thinning behavior.
* is one of the Cross-exp viscosity model constants.
An optimum melt temperature exists. This data can be obtained directly from the resin manufacturer or through trial and error. Recommended melt temperature ranges for various generic grades of resins are available in the C-MOLD Database, along with data for certain commercial grades. Typically, the upper range of temperatures provided by the manufacturer is used to mold thin sections, while the lower range is used to mold thick sections.
The melt temperature should be such that material can be forced into the cavity with relative ease. On the other hand, it should not be so low as to cause difficulty in filling by requiring high injection pressure. A combination of low melt temperature and high pressure often causes quality control problems and high warpage.
High melt temperature coupled with long residence time might lead to material degradation. Higher melt temperatures also require more time to cool and thus add to the overall cycle time.
Melt temperatures influence the degree of molecular orientation in the part, which in turn affects the final part quality.
The coolant temperature determines the mold-wall temperature. For effective cooling, the mold temperature must be kept at some optimal value. High mold temperature requires more time to cool and leads to longer cycle time, while low mold temperature might cause difficulty in filling and lead to short shot. This range of coolant temperatures is usually obtained from the manufacturer. Recommended values of mold temperature for various generic grades of resins are available in the C-MOLD Database, along with data for certain commercial grades.
The mold temperature also affects crystallization rate, which can affect the final part quality.
The optimum mold temperature is unique to every polymer and type of geometry.
The parting plane normal defines the machine direction in which the clamp force is calculated. The default parting plane normal is along the z-axis of the global model coordinates.
Fixities are normally along the boundary edges (known as boundary conditions) where some displacements are fixed as zero, and they are defined by setting the corresponding displacements to zero for the service loading analysis. Fixities can also be applied where a screw is used to fix the part. Minimally, enough fixities must be supplied to fix the rigid-body movement for the service loading analysis, or the analysis will not converge. Rigid-body movement can be in X, Y, and Z directions, or rotate around X, Y, and Z axes; thus, the six degrees of freedom must be fixed through single or multiple nodes.
Constrained fixity has a value of 1, and unconstrained fixity has a value of 0.
Plastic elements should also come with a mandatory element property of the thickness/diameter and shape factor (T-CODE 30100).
Optional element properties are the initial fill condition (T-CODE 30102) and the hot runner manifold ID (T-CODE 30104).
Channel elements should come with mandatory element properties of the diameter and shape factor (T-CODE 30100).
Note: Exterior mold element, type=2, is not supported in v4.0, but reserved for future versions.
In the case of TRI elements, the shape factor is defined as
, where t is the averaged thickness based on volume, S is the total top and bottom surface areas, and V is the volume between top and bottom surfaces.
In the case of 1-D elements, the shape factor is defined as
, where d is the equivalent diameter based on
, C is the perimeter, and A is the cross-sectional area.The shape factor is equal to one for flat surface and circular runners.
This property is the optional element property for hot runner.
This property is the optional element property for mold elements.
This elemental property is the optional element property for planar and 1-D elements; only positive side ID is used for 1-D elements.
This property is the optional element property for planar elements. It is only used by the RTM/SRIM feature of C-MOLD Reactive Molding.
)
, is defined as the tapered angle from node 1 to node 2. The diameter at node 2 is greater than the diameter at node 1 if the tapered angle is positive.The global coordinate of the starting point of the tapered runner is x,y,z. It should be coincided with the axis of the element.
This elemental property is the optional element property for runner elements.
/4 < angle <
/4
The runner diameter will not be changed if the maximum diameter and minimum diameter are equal.
This property is the optional element property for runner element.